Men Who Rape The Psychology Of Fender Essay - 1772 Words

A. Nicholas Groth’s book Men Who Rape The Psychology of the Offender is a revelation towards anyone who ever believed in the common myths surrounding female sexuality and what stereotypically marks a potential rapist (stranger in the streets, homeless man etc.). The book is lauded by critics as being a must have for anyone professionally working with offenders or victims of sexual violence. This book provided me a clear understanding as to why men rape, which is based on three primary reasons: power, anger, and sex desire (least accepted). I was able to understand why men, women and children behave that way, since the book provided many detailed examples and explanations. This book details a no-nonsense, clinical overview of rape, of both the offenders and the victims. It was very difficult to read, as it is full of stories of actual rapes, gets inside the minds of some very sick men, and shows the trauma of the victims after the assault. Although this was distressing for me, the author did not pull any punches here, because averting our eyes from horrors only perpetuates those horrors. Just like hoping that it will never happen to you does not mean that it ever will .This book does a good job at dispelling many of the common myths about both rapists and rape victims. It s a fairly objective, balanced, honest treatment of the subject, but a few times it was clear that they were catering to the radical feminists in their audience. What I found interesting was the factual wayShow MoreRelatedQuestions on Abnormal Psychology4701 Words   |  19 Pagesdominate(s) this field of psychology.   A.theory and speculation   B.statistical analysis from experiments   C.observation and patient interviews   D.experimental research with controlled groups Answer Key:  A Question 3 of 50 1.0 Points Jill was the victim of a fender-bender accident in which she was driving a car struck in a parking lot. Although she felt well initially, she developed back pain immediately after being contacted by the other driver s insurance company who wanted to settle. A thorough

William Shakespeare s A Midsummer Night s Dream For An...

People are relative. This is to say that people are interested in people that are relevant to them, including their families, friends, colleagues and others that remind them of themselves. So if William Shakespeare wrote A Midsummer Night’s Dream for an aristocratic wedding, why would he include average theater company tradesmen? Far from aristocrats, some crities argue that these characters are irrelevant, however Shakespeare includes the company to emphasize contrast, and Nick Bottom to introduce the idea that all is wonderfully ambiguous. Contrast and ambiguity, while opposites, are complements. Contrast implies certainty while ambiguity implies uncertainty. Contrasting characteristics are direct and defined while ambiguous ones are†¦show more content†¦The main issue occurs when they inform Helena of their plan, revealed when Helena says: â€Å"For ere Demetrius looked on Hermia’s eyne, / He hailed down oaths that he was only mine; And when this hail some heat from Hermia felt, / So he dissolved, and showers of oaths did melt. / I will go tell him of fair Hermia’s flight. / Then to the wood will he tomorrow night / Pursue her; and for this intelligence / If I have thanks, it is a dear expense. / But herein mean I to enrich my pain, / To have his sight thither and back again† (1.1.245-251). Helena mentions that this will be an expense to betray Hermia and Lysander’s friendship by sharing their secret with Demetrius and she mentions that it might hurt her to see Demetrius looking at his love, Hermia, but she fails to mention some issues. First, like Hermia and Lysander, she fails to recognize the dangers of venturing into an unexplored wood. She also fails to mention that Demetrius might not thank her or give her any satisfaction in exchange for her help. Both Hermia and Lysander’s and Helena’s decisions are spontaneous and not fully thought out. The fairies and the wood are said to be representative o f chaos and this is especially apparent in the fairies. A large example of their unthorough thought process is shown in Oberon and Puck when they utilize the juice of the little western flower. Oberon says: â€Å"Having once this juice, / I’ll watch Titania when she is asleep / And drop the liquor of it in her eyes. / The

Short Case free essay sample

At your company, a bottler of natural spring water, the advertising department has recently launched a campaign that emphasizes the purity of your product. The industry is highly competitive, and your organization has been badly hurt by a lengthy strike of unionized employees. The strike seriously disrupted production and distribution, and it caused your company to lose significant revenues and market share. Now that the strike is over, your company will have to struggle to recoup lost customers and will have to pay for the increased wages and benefits called for in the new union contract. The company’s financial situation is precarious to say the least. You and the entire senior management team have high hopes for the new ad campaign, and initial consumer response has been positive. You are shocked, then, when your head of operations reports to you that an angry worker has sabotaged one of your bottling plants. We will write a custom essay sample on Short Case or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The worker introduced a chemical into one of the machines, which in turn contaminated 120,000 bottles of the spring water. Fortunately, the chemical is present in extremely minute amounts—no consumer could possibly suffer harm unless he or she drank in excess of 10 gallons of the water per day over a long period of time. Since the machine has already been sterilized, any risk of long term exposure has been virtually eliminated. But, of course, the claims made by your new ad campaign could not be more false. List all of the stakeholders involved in this situation. Do any stakeholder groups have more to gain or lose than others? Develop a strategy for dealing with the contamination. How much does a company’s financial situation determine how ethical dilemmas are handled? In this situation the list of stakeholders would be everyone in the company. If the company is not able to make money then the company is at stake and this stakeholders are everyone that is employed, this includes myself as the owner of the company to the labor employees that have a newly negotiated labor contract. I do not believe that anyone group has more or less to loose; instinctively, I would think the lower wage workers would have more to loose, but is actually not true, because its all relative. The strategy I would use to deal with this situation is to stay honest an true to the product the company sells and to the employees. First, I would write a detailed letter to everyone explaining the situation. I would explain the position of the company before this incident and the potential implications of this situation. The company’s financial situation has a lot to deal with how this situation. Which is why I feel it is important to be transparent. My plan would be to dispose of the contaminated supply along with any equipment that would contaminate future products. I would work the manager or director of infection control to make sure the contaminated product is appropriately disposed of and to come up with a plan that would insure this does not happen again. One all is said and done, I would relay all relevant information to all the employees of the organization. Further, I would l relay a newly created policy of what how employees will how act in this manner will be dealt with.

Is torture acceptable free essay sample

Torture involves deliberately inflicting physical or mental pain on a person without legal cause. This includes threats to family members and loved ones. But, before you object that there cant ever be a legal cause for inflicting pain, consider painful medical treatments, soldiers wounded in a legally declared war, or contestants in a boxing match. Torture is fair and right . Torture has been used as a punishment, to intimidate, control, or to get information from people. For example, in a time ticking bomb scenario there is a bomb that will detonate in a public area somewhere very soon. The person who planted the bomb is the only one who knows where it’s location is. That person is being held by the police/intelligence agency, he is refusing to disclose the location of the bomb under interrogation. The three reasons torture is justified in this scenario are that; firstly there is a specific time pressure and the knowledge that there is no other possible way to retrieve the information. We will write a custom essay sample on Is torture acceptable or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Secondly, why just give up and let hundreds or thousands die when there is an alternative. Thirdly, because the man is strongly assumed to be guilty, he deserves punishment for his actions! Although torture can be used to save lives as was previously stated. The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights does not approve torture.The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights states in article 5 that No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman degrading treatment or punishment. So based on this document regardless of what that person previously done or have got accused of he still has rights and they should not be violated. Laws are here for a reason to keep order and to make sure everyone is treated right and fair. If we just go ahead and disregard instead of embracing the law there will be mayhem. Another reason torture is right is because despite of whether the terrorist is right or not, it is still the duty of a democratic State to protect its  citizens. This is because of the ‘social contract’.Citizens support the State because collectively there are certain social goals that can only be achieved through an organized body. In this instance, individual citizens are unable to protect themselves, so the State steps in. If the purpose of the State is to achieve these goals, it is irrelevant whether that terrorist is right or not. When that terrorist has stepped outside the social contract by damaging the State, the terrorist is no longer protected by the State and is not owed any civil rights that go with it. In conclusion torture is fair and right in every way. Not only to protect the people of the United States but, for the land we have time and time again fought for. Security is very important to us, once anyone creates a threat to national security it becomes a problem. The Department of Defense will do whatever it takes to keep this country safe and sound from harm.